eee1313: (SWINTON)
[personal profile] eee1313
Today when I came into the office, I saw that one of the warehouse guys hung a huge poster of the NCAA Tournament bracket by the door. And this reminded me not of college basketball, but instead that today marks the start of FUG MADNESS 2010!!! Woo-hoo! I still need to fill out my bracket, and I have no clear-cut favorite for this year. (Last year's hopes of a win for SWINTON were quashed by that tacky Aubrey O'Day.) I have a feeling that Miley Cyrus may go far this year, but the one-two punch of Patricia Arquette & Thomas Jane could be surprise us all and go even farther. Only time will tell...

***


In other news, last night I made my first batch of Nanaimo bars! Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] yakgirl for sending me the custard powder, and to [livejournal.com profile] bigboobedcanuck for the recipe. Tonight, I attempt butter tarts. Oh, Canada!

***


We got a Wii Fit. So far I am LOVING it. So much fun! I'm mostly doing stretching with the yoga poses (which I'm totally feeling in my left arm this morning) and the aerobic stuff. Of course, in one day's time the Scientist has already lost a pound, whereas I've gained one. Dammit. I just need to not look at his stats, or have him know mine. As long as I'm enjoying myself and actually DOING SOMETHING rather than just sitting on my ass, I'm happy. I'm not looking at the Wii Fit as the answer to all of my physical issues (generally better shape, weight loss, increased endurance), but I AM looking at it as a start towards improving myself. Do I want to go to a gym? No, because I am afraid of it. I have issues, whatever. Do I mind jumping around in my living room while little avatars of my friends and family jump around on a TV screen with me? Yes. Yes, I do. So maybe -- MAYBE -- if I start to feel some kind of change in my body, I'll be more inclined to, say, go use the gym at the clubhouse, or maybe someday go for a run around the neighborhood. But for now, I like the Wii.

Um, no.

Date: 2010-03-18 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yakgirl.livejournal.com
The BMI charts are not an exact measure (duh), but it exists for a reason-- ask MY Scientist. So next time you come visit, bring your bathing suit, and Dr. Pooflung can get you down to URI, and (on the weekend of course, with no one around) you can get an ACCURATE measure of BMI in the BodPod (it looks like an egg). And, no, 162 pounds on your frame would NOT look anorexic. 125 pounds would. You'd be ROCKIN' at 162. Actually, so would I! That's what I was in high school, and I was a size 13 then, so it's not like I couldn't have lost a few more pounds.

Of course, this is coming from your sister who is currently sitting on HER OWN fat ass, drinking a coke, surfing the net, and watching tv while I should be mothering my kids. Oh well.

Re: Um, no.

Date: 2010-03-18 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yakgirl.livejournal.com
Point of clarification: BMI does not equal body fat percentage, but BMI IS a strong indicator of increased risk for health concerns. Yes, some professional athletes would measure "obese" but they do hours of exercise per day, and are NOT regular people (like me). Being categorized as overweight on a BMI scale does not mean you have increased health risk, being obese does. That's why insurance rates go up for people labeled obese using BMI.

So if you want an accurate measure of body fat, you can come down and try the BodPod. Not that I've ever done it-- ugh-- ignorance is bliss!

And, since I realized I didn't say it before-- good job getting moving with the Wii. Whatever works, right? I want my little sister around for a long, LONG time!!! Love you.

Re: Um, no.

Date: 2010-03-18 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eee1313.livejournal.com
You can think what you want, but I'll think what I want. And I think the BMI is total bullshit. Seeing girls who look totally healthy (http://www.flickr.com/photos/77367764@N00/sets/72157602199008819/) being labeled as "overweight" is, without proper clarification from doctors, completely mentally unhealthy and is only contributing to sizest attitudes and/or body disorders. (Just my opinion here, no fact to back it up.) But seeing a girl like this (http://www.flickr.com/photos/77367764@N00/1458077972/in/set-72157602199008819/) being called "overweight" makes me sad. Because she looks normal and healthy to me. Whereas this (http://www.flickr.com/photos/77367764@N00/1489595533/in/set-72157602199008819/) is "normal," and this is, for a lot of people, unattainable for lots of different reasons. It's these kinds of examples that make me really dislike BMI. It needs to come with a big explanation, rather than just code words to tell you that if you're "normal" or not.

And no, I have no desire to get into a bathing suit so your husband can measure my body fat. Thank you, but no. And let's not get into a MY scientist/YOUR scientist conversation EVER, okay? Okay.

Profile

eee1313: (Default)
eee1313

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 06:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios